And now Reddit is back again for another try at this, stating this time, “While the rule on hate protects such (vulnerable) groups, it does not protect those who promote attacks of hate or who try to hide their hate in bad faith claims of discrimination.”
The first definition was simply outrageous; the new one sounds like it was crafted by an intern.
Reddit will not protect the speech of those “who promote attacks of hate or who try to hide their hate in bad faith claims of discrimination”?
It's pretty much a carte blanche to openly do whatever they want in relation to censorship.
You could tell even Rankovic herself is stunned:
It's pretty much a carte blanche to openly do whatever they want in relation to censorship.
I hereby declare that all speech promotes attacks of hate.
I hereby declare that all claims of discrimination against anyone for any reason are in bad faith.