Don't you worry about that, I knew from the word go that you were incapable of a proper discussion. I just wanted to see for how long you'd embarrass yourself.
For quite long, it seems. Tell me again how I was driven out.
Looks like you have nothing to say in defense of your demands for censorship, nor any of your other ridiculous claims.
And I have to burst your bubble. No one ousted me, much to my chagrin.
Part of the job description
Appears to be all you do. You (almost) never do what you claim to be dedicated to.
be it covert SJW co-opters or overt alt-right co-opters.
Oh, this is good. Go right ahead and demonstrate how I am either.
I already know that accusing colleges/academia of being the original sin
This makes no sense whatsoever. You don't know what original sin is.
You predictably voted for the ban on unrelated political shit because you wanted the sub to be more than just about defending gaming/entertainment. You wanted it to be about political shit in general.
You wouldn't vote for a ban on unrelated politics if you want politics there. Even you should be able to understand that.
the votes for the various vote-stackable opinion surveys that you dumbasses misinterpreted as being binding referendums on the sub.
Which were announced as binding referenda (the plural of 'referendum').by the moderators.
It's almost as though you're saying that you yourself actually contributed anything worthwhile to the sub.
Quite a bit, as is affirmed by the users with their votes. You, on the other hand, have contributed barely anything beyond "there needs to be more censorship".
You are literally a minority of 1. No one agrees with your extreme love of censorship. Not even the mods, which is why you have sunk to bashing even them for not sufficiently being fonf of censorship. If anything should prove that I am correct, it's that you hate me so much.
why should a gamer such as myself give a shit about defending "free speech"
I rest my case.
I joined Gamergate and KIA to defend gaming from SJWs
Did you? I have barely ever seen you talk about that, or really anything except trying to impose more censorship on KiA.
being a broad, politically-obsessed shithole of a sub?
I voted for the ban on unrelated politics. But of course, you call basically everything 'politics', including attacks on free speech on college campuses.
you have to come crawling back
Oh?
under the guise of representing the "popular opinion" yet again.
The vote spoke for itself.
Get the fuck off the sub.
I don't take orders from people who contribute nothing and only agitate for more censorship.
Nearly every post that touches on race and gender in KIA is sympathetic towards whites and dudes.
The question was not about posts, but about insults at groups. This generally doesn't happen to white men - or Middle Easterners. Nor do white men get offended a lot. Except when they are SJWs and can take offense on behalf of others.
Yet you were quite interested in changing the subject to 'white men', or 'dudes' as you call them - which is quite distinctive.
Neutering the mods' ability to police their own community
It's not "their own community". The sub belongs to the community, and the community definitely does not belong to moderators.
You got some fucking nerve responding to my posts
Sorry, Your Highness. I didn't know that you were some sort of sacred figure.
I'm far more convinced your own anti-R3 crusade-like politicking is far more befitting of being considered an "ideology "
All your meta contributions that I have ever seen, have always been aimed at trying to establish more censorship, more curation, more removal of stuff that the community likes. So sitting on your own extreme of pro-censorship, you no doubt do regard anyone who doesn't like censorship as crazed by ideology.
Go back to KIA2 where you crawled from.
How about no?
Do you prohibit black mods from enforcing R1 against people trying to incite racial violence?
They have no black mods. Too much Wight Supremacist Patriarchy for that.
Do you not let pinkerbelle enforce R1
[slow tap]
not their goddamned demographics.
KiA2 does not have a similar policy, but I find it quite good, actually. 'Transgender' is an ideology. You don't want people who are enthralled to such an ideology to remove comments about it. The more potential bias you avoid, including bias because of demographics, the better.
Quite apart from that, you do not want a moderator (and I think this is the primary reason for KiA) to appear to be partial to his own demographic, which delegitimizes the decisions that he makes.
Nah. That was an admin-wide decision when david-me serially sabotaged himself. That is not the sort of thing that will be decided by a single admin.
Then the aggressive responses may not help. This might explain why GammaKing went in quite hard against the 'current situation'.
I've never had an encounter with this admin. Our sjwhate admin was, coincidentally perhaps, the same admin who made the announcement on ModSupport.
Sit down. We don't need moderators coercing their users. And we sure as hell don't need to flush down 125k subscribers down the drain.
Over on SocialJusticeInAction we just had a similar weird admin encounter. Mind you, it's not the fact that an admin gave us a poke and said "get off your asses about sitewides" that bothers me. Speaking for myself at least, real life has been kicking my ass lately and I've fallen behind on moderating, I know other mods there have had some similar problems and...yeah probably stuff IS getting through that shouldn't.
I'll break my rule against not commenting here to point this out.
This looks very much like a message that we received at /r/sjwhate very soon before we were banned for quite flimsy reasons. The difference was that in that case, the admin cited 7 comments that he found in violation of sitewides, and that he recommended that we make a sticky announcing the changes.
We did as the Master commanded, and still two months later they found an excuse. Which led me to the conclusion that such messages from admins are the death-knell for any sub.
You sure tried.