The plaintiff presented her case first, arguing that men were promoted ahead of women, that ideas coming from women were more quickly dismissed and that women who experienced sexual harassment received little support. Pao claimed that Ajit Nazre, the partner who initiated a sexual relationship with her, was responsible for much of this harassment. Pao said that he began excluding her from important meetings and emails after she ended the relationship. To characterize the company's response, her case explained that $22,000 was deducted from his paycheck once and that there was no strong desire to reprimand him until an outside investigation was able to link him to multiple instances of harassment.
a conversation in a company jet that she felt objectified women
Same woman that filed a sexual discrimination lawsuit against her employer in 2012
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pao_v._Kleiner_Perkins#Plaintiff's_case