Very early in August, the mods of r/animemes decided, suddenly and without community involvement, to change the rules of their subreddit and ban the use of the word "trap" as a transphobic slur, despite the fact that it is generally used in reference to male identifying crossdressers who gain amusement or sexual gratification from confusing others as to their gender, and NOT as a term for trans people. The logic given to justify the ban anyway was that some people call trans people traps anyway, despite this being a clear misuse of the word. Users were told to just call them femboys instead. The obvious point that if this became the new common parlance term for traps, transphobes would simply call trans people THAT instead, and on and on and on in a neverending treadmill of word bans, was raised numerous times and largely ignored by the mods and their supporters, as was the point that trying to pigeonhole traps into the trans umbrella reinforces rigid gender roles and invalidates the idea that an effeminate man can still be a man.
From the beginning, it was clear that the overwhelming majority of the sub, roughly 94% based on many polls and voting totals, was staunchly against the trap ban and did not agree that the word was transphobic. Numerous transgender posters and self-identifying traps weighed in to express disagreement with the ban. Mods refused to budge.
It quickly became clear to the userbase that external subreddits, foremost r/traa, were heavily involved in persuading the mods to take this action. Users from these places were brigading r/animemes to support the mods and argue with anti-ban users, frequently calling users names, condescending to them, or otherwise breaking the sub's rules on civil discourse with no action from the mods. Meanwhile, multiple mods were caught themselves going to these subs to gloat and grandstand about the ban, calling their own community bigots, chuds, and similar, and clearly inciting the brigades.
At this point, what began as an organic outpouring of argument against the ban became a campaign, a deliberate effort, through memes and upvotes, to fill the front page of the sub with pro-trap and anti-mod posts as a form of protest, and the rest of Reddit began to notice and get involved.
Now, I can think of no more tried and true, nor more universally understood to be valid, form of protest than the simple act of mass-speaking. Of a large group of people gathering in a public place with signs and slogans, making noise and occupying that space until their demands are met. This is the fundamental theory behind strikes, marches, sit-ins, and most other common forms of protest. Peaceful disruption to force those in authority to hear you, and to remind them of your numbers and ability to grind activity to a halt until your grievances are redressed. What happened on Animemes was merely the digital equivalent thereof, the occupation of the space by protesters. And what's more, the simple structure of reddit guarantees such a protest to be completely bottom-up rather than top-down, and democratic in nature. Only the majority can occupy a subreddit in such a way, as a preponderance of downvotes can end the visibility of their occupation at any time. Vocal minorities cannot hold communities hostage with this tactic, nor does a community fighting its moderators have access to any back-end tools that can advantage their messages in the market of ideas. As large subreddits usually have organized mod teams with private discord or slack channels, grassroots rebellions of this nature also at least start out with an organizational disadvantage as well.
And while it's certainly true that many users became involved in the revolt who do not normally post on the sub, myself included, this was happening on both sides, and any accusation of brigading becomes moot after a sub's own mods go to other communities to gin up support. It cannot be valid for one side to receive external help, but not the other. There is also almost no possibility that external influence changed the grassroots, democratic nature of the revolution, as the external posters were coming in from both sides and likely cancelled out, and moreover because this was a HUGE SUB, frequently fielding thousands and thousands of actives at a time. Even if T_D still existed on reddit, it wouldn't have had the numbers to camp on a sub that size and overwhelm its native community by 90+% voting margins, there simply is no culture war community on reddit that DOES. The vast majority of participation and voting was clearly ordinary users of the sub.
Once the revolution was in full swing, the sub moderators began a series of clearly bad faith actions to attempt to stop it, exacerbating the problem each time. First, the largely absentee head mod returned and promised to listen to the community...but then put out a corporate-style apology full of vague, non-specific promises of community involvement in future rules changes and publicly accepted the resignation of the #2 mod who had most famously insulted the community in other subs...but refused to revert the trap ban, and shortly began talking about hiring more mods, causing users to conclude the "resigned" mod would just be back on an alt anyway and nothing had changed. Then mods began shadowbanning users...which is not something mods can do directly in the sense that admins can, but they can simulate the functionality of a shadowban exactly by setting a bot to remove a user's posts instantly and without them being able to see the post as removed (this action would further invalidate any claim that the revolution was the work of outside brigaders, as we could no longer participate and the revolution only gained steam anyway, especially when users noticed that the claim it was simply a filter against people with no posting history on the sub, as the r/traa brigaders were still able to participate, showing that who got shadowbanned was ideologically based). When this didn't work, mods began stealth editing other rules to give themselves justifications to remove pro-revolution content and ban users for it, blatantly breaking the previous promise that no future rules changes would happen without community involvement. After this was discovered and widely called out, the mods issued a "clarifications" announcement that was automatically stickied in every new post to try and force users to read it, denying they were doing the things they blatantly were doing. They also locked this post from the outset, preventing users from offering any rebuttal. After this, the mods for the most part went radio silent for a long period, though a couple who opposed the trap ban but didn't have enough power on the team to overrule it, kept open lines of communication.
While this was going on, a new sub, r/goodanimemes, was created and began to grow rapidly as a replacement for the original, the only true way to attack a moderator's absolute power over their subreddit, create a replacement and let the community migrate to get away from the unpopular mods (and unlike the founding of resetera, this happened organically, without anybody knocking the original sub offline to make it look dead and force people to look for a new home), no different except without the trap ban, and with a promise that no rules changes would occur without community vote. As soon as it began to gain steam, the subscriber count of r/animemes began to drop rapidly, falling faster with every further mod screwup. The drop was most precipitous in the day or two immediately following the stealth edits to the rules, maintaining for that period upwards of 1000 unsubs per hour. In total, roughly 130,000 people unsubscribed from r/animemes in a two week period, and r/goodanimemes grew by about 200,000 users, from nothing. r/goodanimemes currently sits at around 240k, but is most tellingly receiving upvote totals per post around r/animemes peak numbers, suggesting that nearly the entirety of r/animemes active userbase has moved over to r/goodanimemes...like any 7 year old subreddit, its actual subscriber count is likely heavily bloated with inactive accounts and users who lost interest in the sub but never bothered to unsub from it.
Further, by the end of the revolution, memes were frequently reaching the front page of animemes with under 500 upvotes, but the content was still wall to wall pro-revolution, everybody was simply leaving, decamping to the new sub, and there was no meaningful number of people waiting to take the old sub back once the revolution spam began to wane. But perhaps the clearest evidence of all that the native community of animemes was almost entirely against the trap ban is that to my knowledge, even with animemes now shut down, no new sub has formed as a competitor to goodanimemes WITH the trap ban. There is no split community here, there is no meaningful audience for a version of animemes with the trap ban.
After roughly a week in a holding pattern with animemes subs rapidly dropping and goodanimemes rapidly growing, the mods made a final heavy push to end the revolution and retake the sub, organizing a raid on their own sub on discord to downvote revolution memes and upvote pro-mod memes. It didn't work, not even close, the revolution posters outmatched them severalfold on votes and the raid was an abject failure. Shortly after this, several mods left in rapid succession, apparently giving up on the sub, while others claimed to have been doxxed. I've seen the dox, it exists, though I can't speak to its legitimacy. I won't discuss any of the details here, obviously, and nor should anyone else, but I WILL talk for a moment about the alleged doxxer. Never have I seen a more stereotypical rendition of what SJWs think anti-SJWs are like. This purported person is a literal fedora neckbeard whose profile reads "fuck trannies and niggers", and whose message is in the form of a ransom notice with threats of SWATting and doxxing of family members (neither of these things appear to have ever occurred, AFAIK), it essentially reads as though these mods were doxxed by the terrorist version of GamerGate that exists on Law & Order SVU. Between the over the top nature of this, the fact that by this point the revolution had nothing to gain from doxxing mods and only stood to look bad due to it, and the fact that an immediate effort was made to pin the blame for it on r/goodanimemes (despite that it was never posted there, or if it was it got taken down lightning fast by their mods, nor is there any indication the doxxer has a connection to the sub), I consider it likely this was a false flag by the mods themselves in a final effort to stop the revolution by getting goodanimemes banned and thus hoping to force users back onto animemes, but it also failed, though the admins did force the goodanimemes mods to implement a rule banning all mention of animemes even though goodanimemes did nothing wrong.
A few days after this...so clearly not in fear of the doxxer or in any kneejerk response to the dox, but only after it was clear this would not result in goodanimemes being taken down, animemes went private and several more mods left. Though it is officially "on haitus", mods who continued answering questions about it consider it likely dead for good. It's worth pointing out that though the doxxer's demands have not been met, he has disappeared and not followed through on any of his threats of further doxxings, providing more evidence that this was a false flag.
The revolution gained an unqualified victory, despite that the mods had every conceivable advantage except numbers, including the clear sympathies of the admins, and moreover repeatedly broke their own rules and promises and otherwise acted dishonestly, and in practice has migrated the entire community to a virtually identical subreddit while the mods sit atop a worthless pile of ash. One of the mods famously boasted they would not relent even if they lost 10k subs, which clearly at the time they considered a high estimate. In the end they lost 13x that many. While money was not involved, I consider this about as stark an example of Get Woke Go Broke as one can possibly get. This entire broad, massive community, acting with near-unity, rejected woke demands and de-facto kicked out their own mods in the manner of the Simpsons' "no Homers club". The whole thing strikes me as a microcosm of the culture war entirely in fact, in which the SJW side controls the institutions completely, has every conceivable advantage except numbers, and is held to no rules, not even the ones they themselves make and demand of others, while the anti-SJW side is just grassroots people with no power who are frustrated with the fact they were minding their own business, and one day out of the blue the powers that be deemed them horrible bigots and started demanding they change all their social norms in response in an obvious slippery slope. Of course, it's much easier to migrate a subreddit to another subreddit than to rebuild around billion dollar media conglomerates, which is why this event took about two weeks and the culture war has been ongoing for many years, but like I said, microcosm.
As a closing note, I'd also just point out that the animemes/goodanimemes community was, and as far as I can tell still is, predominately left wing. Despite attempts to falsely label goodanimemes a hate sub, including overt threats to sic r/AgainstHateSubreddits on them, they are not hateful or even politically incorrect people. They seem to be very pro-trans and in favor of rules against hate speech, they simply don't agree with defining hate speech and slurs in overbroad ways that will obviously just begin a cycle of ceding word after word to transphobes in the vein of allowing /pol/ to take ownership of Pepe the Frog or the OK gesture. In fact, the idea that a bunch of people who are clearly fapping to gender-bending anime characters are by and large transphobes is...fairly silly on its face. However, I imagine that these events have created tens if not hundreds of thousands of new anti-SJWs among them...so thanks for that animemes mods, you're the best recruiters my side could ever ask for.
So we're getting quite a few new and lapsed users, and more than one person has asked us just exactly what KIA is.
So here's our mission statement, a basic description of what this place is for, and our half-finished rules still full of less-broken-than-I-thought-it-would-be reddit CSS and placeholder text. As you can clearly tell, THIS IS NOT DONE, we haven't even gotten started on figuring out how much of rule 3 we're gonna change...again...now that the admins are off our backs. For the moment we're allowing some shitposting and general partying, but at least now we'll have something to point to when someone goes too far past the line and needs a smack. Please bear with us as things are still very much under construction. Also, we need to do something about the character limit that's forcing me to put half of this into a sticky, so...SEE STICKY!
Our Mission
KotakuInAction is a platform for open discussion of the issues where gaming, nerd culture, the Internet, and media collide.
We believe that the current standards of ethics in the media have alienated the artists, developers, and creators who perpetuate the things we love, enjoy, and enthusiastically build communities around. We have observed numerous incidents involving conflicts of interest and agenda-pushing within media which we feel are damaging to the credibility of the medium and harm the community at large. We believe much of the current media is complicit in the proliferation of an ideology that squashes individuality, divides along political lines, and is stifling to the freedom of creativity that is the foundation of human expression.
KotakuInAction is a community that condemns willful censorship, exclusion, harassment, and abuse. It is a community that organizes to hold the media accountable to the concept of artistic freedom by standing up for the artist, the developer, the writer, the filmmaker, and all who enjoy the freedom to create, explore, and expand. It is a community that allows the exchange of information, supports the ongoing discussion of media ethics, and protects the right of the individual to embrace their personal interests in entertainment and fandom.
KotakuInAction is built around a core focus on reasonable, friendly discussion of the issues related to gaming culture, and those involved in it. That is not all we are about, but it's where we began and will remain our core. We hold ourselves to be politically neutral ground, not forcing anyone to conform in their opinions, and permitting a wide variety of viewpoints to express themselves in a civil manner.
Code Of Conduct for KotakuInAction
WARNING/BAN POLICY
For the sake of making it easier to read, more transparent, and to cut back on confusion regarding which rules get dealt with in which way, we are pulling the warning/ban policy out of Rule 1 and moving it to stand independently so that other rules with specific policies are all in one place. The updated policy is as follows:
General Rule 1 Enforcement
You'll get two public warnings from the mods. Any offenses after that, and you'll get a 3 day temporary ban. Screw up again, and you're gone for a month. Screw up again, and you're not coming back.
Warnings will expire after 90 days. So if you got a warning and didn't screw up for, say, three months, and get warned again, that counts as your first warning on the road to being banned. However, if you received a temp ban for breaking Rule 1, it'll stay on your record, and won't expire for a year, so if you screw up after that before a year has gone by, you go to a 7-day/month-long ban and the year-long timer resets. Basically, don't screw around.
Rule 7 Enforcement
If a user is determined by at least two moderators to have violated Rule 7, they will be issued one warning not to do so again. If they repeat the behavior, as agreed upon by at least three moderators, they will be issued a 7 day ban. Doing so again (and agreed upon again by at least three moderators) will result in a permanent ban.
Other Rule Enforcement
All other rules will generally be enforced with a single warning followed by at least one temporary ban before any permanent ban is issued. The notable exceptions are Rule 2 (dox) and Rule 5 (personal army requests), which we reserve the right to immediately and without warning issue a permanent ban. In more severe or extreme cases of violations of other rules, should at least three moderators agree a user needs to bypass the standard warning/ban process and be moved straight to a permanent ban, such action may be taken, though this route should not be taken often.
Moderator Rule-Breaking Policy
Compared to regular Rule 1 enforcement, this is going to be bit more strict - first violation results in warning (publicly visible as all other warnings), second warning within a month will result in temporary suspension or permanent removal of permissions.
Reporting of mod violations should be done via modmail - please provide link to violation, rule violated and context, if necessary. If you don't want to report via modmail, you can also report to the head moderator directly. If you don't want that either, you may elect someone to report on your behalf. Nevertheless, links and context are required. Needless to say the mod in question won't be involved in evaluation of said violation.
GENERAL RULES
- DON'T BE A DICKWOLF
Attack arguments, not people.
"Fuck off, retard," is not an argument. Neither is "Kill yourself, faggot." Regardless of whether you think someone is a shill, SJW, or whatever, stick to arguing the points. Name-calling does not contribute to discussion. Refer to the pyramid as a general guideline. If anything, just make sure your criticism outweighs any insults. However, well-reasoned arguments that end with parting shots like, "Stop being obtuse; even children understand this concept," are okay. Ostensibly, we're all adults here; a comment like that can just be ignored.
The core of this rule is primarily based on patterns of behavior, which fall into these categories:
1. Harassment
Badgering and/or baiting another user across multiple threads or baiting after disengaging (mod enforced or otherwise), including persistent mentions and/or replies. Note that this generally does not apply to people that are outside the community, (e.g. "God, the guy who wrote that article is such a fucking retard."), but does apply in cases of tagging a user (e.g. "reallybadpersonidontlike you're a fucking mongoloid and you should go die in a fire.").
2. Trolling
Posts and comments which are clearly not intended to generate discussion, but rather aimed at generating or maximizing as much drama and emotion as possible. Intentionally posting to make people angry.
3. Crusading
Posts and comments intended to drive a wedge in the community, or to rally a mob to target users or communities, without the intent to hold a constructive discussion. Crusading eschews conversation, going beyond well-meaning criticism into behavior that includes excessive attacks against specific users, demands that action be taken against specific users, and/or bombarding a post with hostility towards KiA or specific users.
4. Malice
Don't resort to malicious name-calling, brazen insults, and/or general hostility against any individual user. Don't use identity politics or unironic slurs (that is, language intended to advocate blatant hatred) against groups of people. Don't make serious calls for violence against individuals or groups. If you're joking, please make clear you are joking so we don't have to slap you for it.
2. No Doxxing
We do not allow the publication of personal information, which is defined as:
1. Real names
Exceptions are made for "public figures," including (but not limited to) journalists, actors, published authors, and public-facing company personalities, as well as the subjects of published journalistic articles (limited purpose public figures). Facebook and LinkedIn pages may only be linked for corporations and public figures.
2. Phone numbers or addresses
Public contact numbers/address for companies (not including individual employees) are exempt.
3. Promotion of known doxxing sites
Certain websites exist for the primary purpose of collecting and spreading dox. You may not link to them, encourage others to visit them, or discuss them by name. The list of such sites can be found here. (link)
4. Other info which may be used to personally identify someone
Including personal e-mail addresses that are not intentionally available to the public, images of homes, etc.
If you are in doubt whether what you posted may constitute posting personal information, reach out to the moderator team. (link)
3. POSTING GUIDELINES
Posts on KotakuInAction must focus on one of the topics included in the whitelist and may not include a topic from the blacklist.
Post that do not meet this criterium will be removed. Removals due to Rule 3 alone have no consequences aside from the post being removed.
Meta Posts are excluded from this rule.
Whitelist
- Gaming
- Journalism Ethics
- Censorship
- Official Social Justice
- Media Meta
- Tabletop gaming, comics, sci-fi/fantasy, manga/anime, and derivative media of such
- Sub related OC Artwork
- Tech Happenings
Temporary Whitelist Items
- None
Blacklist
- Unrelated Politics
- Memes (as in image macros)
- E-Celeb Bullshit
- Forum Noise (random users complaining on random forums [directly involved devs are exempt from this])
- Social Media Hot Takes
- Lets Plays
Temporary Blacklist Items
None
Notes
-
To pass unrelated pol, topics containing politicians; laws; government or major political organizations without direct relation to GamerGate, must be presented without partisan slant and the majority of the topic must focus on relevant actions or proposals, rather than their partisan or electoral implications.
-
Official social justice is defined as: The propagation or implementation of identity politics by institutions or companies of major size.
-
Tech Happenings is defined as: Significant events concerning the policies, business practices, algorithms, behavior, and corporate cultures of tech companies and social networks, especially where pertaining to free expression, identity politics, and anti-consumer activities, as well as legislation affecting tech spaces.
-
If you believe your post is of sufficient importance to the community but are concerned that it would not pass the above guidelines, please contact the modteam for approval
4. Posts must be intelligible
-
Non-English links must include a translation in the immediate comments from the OP. This can be either a full length translation, a copypaste of a machine translation, or a direct link to a full machine translation of the page.
-
All links to videos longer than 5 minutes will require either a comment by the OP or to be in a self post summarizing the relevant parts of the video to what they are trying to point out with it. Exceptions may be allowed if the title is clearly explaining what's going on with the link pointing directly at the relevant timestamp in the video.
-
Avoid mobile links if possible.