Win / KotakuInAction
KotakuInAction
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction The almost-official GamerGate website
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

335
Gamergate Ground Zero : What Eron Gjoni said in the Zoe Post about Zoe Quinn and the Kotaku journalist Nathan Grayson. - useful post from the KiA archives about what set all this off (it's not "sex for reviews")... (archive.vn)
posted 4 years ago by B-VOLLEYBALL-READY 4 years ago by B-VOLLEYBALL-READY +342 / -7
39 comments share
39 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (39)
sorted by:
▲ 44 ▼
– Zaszz345 44 points 4 years ago +44 / -0

Didn’t Zoe Quinn also make a game developer kill himself a year ago after she accused him of sexual assault on Twitter with no evidence but her word? I’m pretty sure that was her anyway.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 40 ▼
– B-VOLLEYBALL-READY [S] 40 points 4 years ago +40 / -0

Yes.

https://thepostmillennial.com/exclusive-zoe-quinns-allegations-are-falling-apart

https://thepostmillennial.com/exclusive-alec-holowkas-private-messages-reveal-zoe-quinns-abuse

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 33 ▼
– Zaszz345 33 points 4 years ago +33 / -0

Jesus. I thought so. What a monster. Her and Anita truly are the unholy duo for gaming. Just destroying anything video game related where they go.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– MikePlacid 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

Read the first PostMillenial article. It referenced an article in Boston Magazine about GamerGate. That article mentions Alex Lifschitz, the next Zoe’s boyfriend, very supportive of her and feminism. Felt sorry for him. Decided to check his fate. And yes: https://twitter.com/brad_glasgow/status/1167259230010822656/photo/3

Alex Lifschitz, the guy that was with Zoe Quinn at the time of Gamergate, who helped create Crash Override Network... got #MeToo'd, along with Elizabeth Sampat, who was key in starting the false allegations against Nolan Bushnell.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TheRedThirst 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Hey BVolley, good to see you, how long have you been on 2.win?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 20 ▼
– FluffiPuff 20 points 4 years ago +20 / -0

Zoe Quinn is a treacherous spider, sucking the life from all within her reach.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– MikePlacid 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

Reading Zoe Thread:

Before I found out, she’d take great pleasure in laying claim to the moral high ground at all times, denouncing anyone who would do anything she was secretly doing all of the time.

Isn’t this a one-line picture of the whole of liberal politics? I wonder why they are so similar...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– GalanDun 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

That's the best insult I've ever heard.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– Calico_fox 17 points 4 years ago +17 / -0

Also, she may have become a "game dev" just to get revenge on Alec Holowka (game developer who kill himself) because he broke up with her (she thought he was the one), which happened right before he hit it big.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Tranny_Fluid 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

Yup

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 27 ▼
– AnastasiusFocht 27 points 4 years ago +27 / -0

Don't forget she also tested the waters by cancelling a game jam before she abused Eron

Re-reading that blogpost in retrospect it's even more blatant of how much an abusive predator she is.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– huntrrz 15 points 4 years ago +15 / -0

Before that she was trolling an autist forum so she could cherry pick angry responses so she could claim people were targeting her.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– AnastasiusFocht 13 points 4 years ago +13 / -0

yep, harassing the wizards was reprehensible, and she's personally responsible for the suicides of many as she re-crafted the narrative around incels to be a misogyny thing instead of just a really sad group of people working through shit.

An all round horrible person with no redeeming qualities

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– Steampunk_Moustache 14 points 4 years ago +14 / -0

The thing everyone should understand is that a tornado of drama follows Zoe everywhere she goes. Everything she touches becomes a total shitfest of bitching, burnt bridges and hurt feelings. It's a recurring phenomenon that happens in her vicinity.

It should be obvious to anyone who takes a step back and looks at the timeline of events that Zoe herself is not only the root cause of every problem she has, but that ultimate outcome of most of her 'problems' is a net positive for her.

She is an internet savvy, socially savvy individual who clearly knows how to play a certain breed of nerdy males like fiddles - she has a great knack for getting guy after guy after guy to do... basically anything she wants.

Women can smell desperation a mile away, but while most women avoid such men like the plague, Zoe gravitates to them because she understands just how useful their easily swayed minds can be to her, and how easily she can take them down if they get wise to her tricks.

Zoe Crashed that Game Jam because she wanted attention that she knew she wouldn't get if it went ahead as planned. She knew she wouldn't get it, because she knows she can't make a game worth shit - not even a 5 minute flash game. What she knew she COULD do, though, was get a bunch of male nerds to rally around her for a minute chance at tapping an anime-haired gamer girl with a cyborg arm tattoo who wasn't 300lbs.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0
▲ 12 ▼
– GoldenPotatoRequiem 12 points 4 years ago +12 / -0

Sometimes I wonder if things would be completely different today if Zoe and Anita never existed.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– deleted 11 points 4 years ago +11 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– GoldenPotatoRequiem 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0

Guess fate works like that

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– TheLostBeerKeg 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

If only we had a time machine, we could go back and ensure that they never be given the voices they were, by using their own bullshit as a weapon against them.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– GoldenPotatoRequiem 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Who knows, some day in the far future, one based king may go back and fix this mess.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– try4gain 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

As an old school gamer , 90s kid , I cant believe what gaming has turned into. I grew up on shooters. Then all thru 2000s, more shooters. WoW, RA2, Yuris, some others.

Then some time passes and gaming gets HUGE - and obviously taken over by Fake Gamers and people who <3 RBG colors pink hair and attention.

I know girls who game. They also never talk about gaming, or rarely do. They will game for hours and hours grinding out levels.

Im so glad I was born in the 90s. I feel really bad for anyone who has to live their 20s through this version of reality. You are getting burned super hard in like 50 different ways.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– alidade 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

I've never managed to understand gamergate, and after reading this post, I still don't. It's like a soap opera, but lots of people's lives are like soap operas. Why would a lady probably exchanging sex for a good review of her game redpill people? Does anyone suppose that that kind of thing doesn't happen?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– yeldarb1983 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

A little context might help, as gaming journalism did make some small improvements in the transparency department for a while, although at this point, I think letsplayers have more or less replaced journalists as the way I get news about new video games, so I maybe things have backslid since then.

This may get a bit tl;dr, but bear with me.

Also, keeping in line with the theme of ethics and transparency, I've been an observer of the gamergate movement rather than an active participant, and I missed the original mess, so take that into account.

But gaming journalism had a problem with getting a little too cozy with devs for a long time. I used to have access to some EGM* issues from the nineties, and one of the things that sticks out in my mind is how many games got positive or neutral reviews when the games were actually "meh" or garbage. It was actually rare for a game to get less than a neutral rating unless it was from some obscure studio you never heard of. This didn't change in the 2000s, but got worse. An example of the stuff happening behind the scenes is that devs and publishers would offer journalists "sneak peeks" or early access to a game in development or about to be released with the understanding that the journalist couldn't say anything negative about the game in their review. I'm sure there are other examples, but you get the idea.

Frustration with gaming-related press was pretty high around the time that the "zoe post" came out, and it acted like a lightning rod for that frustration. Some of that frustration came out in ways that was harmful to the end goal of gamergate, but the reaction from kotaku, a leading gaming press company, pretty much pissed everybody off, even the more sane gamers at the time.

They wrote about a dozen articles across nearly every website they had, denouncing gamers as "dead" or saying that we "didn't have to be" gamedevs' "customers anymore."

That's when people started to get really pissed, and the short version is gaming press outlets started posting their ethical standards front and center. Meanwhile, kotaku lost all credibility among gamers, and it's parent organization has been passed from owner to owner for the past 5(10?) years.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– BidenSmellsLikeShit 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

She has ugly boobz

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Vordrak 1 point 4 years ago +3 / -2

Ironically, Eron Gjoni is the first #MeToo poster. He is just the 'wrong' sex for the SJWs. All the positives and negatives of #MeToo apply to him.

He is purportedly exposing a person who does wrong in personal relationships. His reliability is of course to be tested and considered like any #MeToo accuser. However, he has a lot of evidence in his support. There are now many men who have accused Zoe Quinn.

Alec Holowka is dead on the basis of her allegations, some of which are verifiably false, contradicted by her contemporaneous tweets. She has yet to produce the game she ran on Kickstarter or account for the funds.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ -3 ▼
– dGPOFniqsrZF -3 points 4 years ago +3 / -6

All this because an insecure fellow from the social media generation aired some dirty laundry because he couldn't handle that a useless conniving female was acting like a useless conniving female.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– B-VOLLEYBALL-READY [S] 13 points 4 years ago +13 / -0

He was right to do this.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– somercet 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

None of this. None of this stems from that.

If Eron had tripped, dropped into an uncovered manhole and been in a coma for the last six years, all of this still would have happened, just in a slightly different form.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 0 ▼
– deleted 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1
▲ 0 ▼
– deleted 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

OUR MISSION
KotakuInAction is a platform for open discussion of the issues where gaming, nerd culture, the Internet, and media collide.

We believe that the current standards of ethics in the media have alienated the artists, developers, and creators who perpetuate the things we love, enjoy, and enthusiastically build communities around. We have observed numerous incidents involving conflicts of interest and agenda-pushing within media which we feel are damaging to the credibility of the medium and harm the community at large. We believe much of the current media is complicit in the proliferation of an ideology that squashes individuality, divides along political lines, and is stifling to the freedom of creativity that is the foundation of human expression.

KotakuInAction is a community that condemns willful censorship, exclusion, harassment, and abuse. It is a community that organizes to hold the media accountable to the concept of artistic freedom by standing up for the artist, the developer, the writer, the filmmaker, and all who enjoy the freedom to create, explore, and expand. It is a community that allows the exchange of information, supports the ongoing discussion of media ethics, and protects the right of the individual to embrace their personal interests in entertainment and fandom.

KotakuInAction is built around a core focus on reasonable, friendly discussion of the issues related to gaming culture, and those involved in it. That is not all we are about, but it's where we began and will remain our core. We hold ourselves to be politically neutral ground, not forcing anyone to conform in their opinions, and permitting a wide variety of viewpoints to express themselves in a civil manner.
.

. GENERAL RULES

  1. DON'T BE A DICKWOLF Attack arguments, not people.

"Fuck off, retard," is not an argument. Neither is "Kill yourself, faggot." Regardless of whether you think someone is a shill, SJW, or whatever, stick to arguing the points. Name-calling does not contribute to discussion. Refer to the pyramid as a general guideline. If anything, just make sure your criticism outweighs any insults. However, well-reasoned arguments that end with parting shots like, "Stop being obtuse; even children understand this concept," are okay. Ostensibly, we're all adults here; a comment like that can just be ignored.

The core of this rule is primarily based on patterns of behavior, which fall into these categories:

1.1 HARASSMENT Badgering and/or baiting another user across multiple threads or baiting after disengaging (mod enforced or otherwise), including persistent /u/ mentions and/or replies. Note that this generally does not apply to people that are outside the subreddit, (e.g. "God, the guy who wrote that article is such a fucking retard."), but does apply in cases of /u/ tagging a user (e.g. "/u/reallybadpersonidontlike you're a fucking mongoloid and you should go die in a fire.").

1.2 TROLLING Posts and comments which are clearly not intended to generate discussion, but rather aimed at generating or maximizing as much drama and emotion as possible. Intentionally posting to make people angry.

1.3 CRUSADING Posts and comments intended to drive a wedge in the community, or to rally a mob to target users or communities, without the intent to hold a constructive discussion. Crusading eschews conversation, going beyond well-meaning criticism into behavior that includes excessive attacks against specific users, demands that action be taken against specific users, and/or bombarding a post with hostility towards KiA or specific users.

1.4 BRIGADING Coming into KiA from a previous sub to post virulent comments, or otherwise try to manipulate the sub. This includes (but is not limited to) uncivil comments from users who frequent (within the last ~2 months) a meta/drama sub that has linked to a specific KiA post, and users who comment on removed posts. This also applies to users who link to KiA on these meta/drama subs, either by archive, screenshot, or direct link. Any non-KiA brigadiers are subject to an expedited ban. We don't have a problem with you criticizing KiA on other subs, just don't come into those threads to start shit after they've been linked. Participate civilly, if you're going to participate at all.

1.5 MALICE Don't resort to malicious name-calling, brazen insults, and/or general hostility against any individual user. Don't use identity politics or unironic slurs (that is, language intended to advocate blatant hatred) against groups of people. Behavior that encourages, glorifies, incites, or calls for violence or physical harm against an individual or a group of people is not allowed, in conjunction with sitewide rules. Do your best to treat your fellow community members excellently.

1.6 ESCALATION TOWARD VIOLENCE Posts and comments making declarative statements about a potential civil war/boogaloo will be removed from KiA. By "declarative statements" any comments which delve into the area of "if X keeps doing Y, then there will be a violent response" or similar are to be included . These removals will not be issued warnings/bans as long as other rules are not breached, just a public statement of why they were removed.

Examples of things which will likely cause removal:

"If they show up at my place, they'll get a face full of lead"

"If they show up here and police try to shut them down, there will be bloodshed"

Other statements which can be interpreted as escalation toward an actual violent act. This list is not all inclusive, these are just examples. We will try to be lenient on it where we can, but have to step in now due to a repeated pattern of this showing up in our report queue.

More generic things like "This will end badly" will not be removed under this rule.

.

  1. DON'T POST PERSONAL INFORMATION Reddit is very strict about the publication of "personal information," commonly referred to as "doxing," so don't post it.

Personal information is constituted as:

2.1 DIRECTLY LINKING TO PERSONAL SOCIAL MEDIA Exceptions are made for "public figures," including (but not limited to) journalists, actors, published authors, and public-facing company personalities. However, direct links to Facebook and LinkedIn are not allowed, due to sitewide rules. Posting archive links to personal information is considered directly linking to it. Linking your own information is permitted. Posts from accounts with fewer than 2,500 followers, or anyone who does not otherwise meet the "public figure" or "limited-purpose public figure" requirements must be in the form of screenshots with all identifying information censored.

2.2 REAL NAMES Exceptions are made for the public figures as mentioned above, also including primary subjects of articles from multiple non-blog sites (or "limited-purpose public figures").

2.3 PHONE NUMBERS OR ADDRESSES Public contact numbers/address for companies (not including individual employees) are exempt.

2.4 OTHER INFO WHICH MAY BE USED TO PERSONALLY IDENTIFY SOMEONE Including sites hosting personal information, images of homes, etc.

If you are in doubt whether what you posted may constitute posting personal information, reach out to the moderator team.

.

  1. POSTING GUIDELINES Posts on KotakuInAction must focus on one of the topics included in the whitelist and may not include a topic from the blacklist. Post that do not meet this criterium will be removed. Removals due to Rule 3 alone have no consequences aside from the post being removed.

Meta Posts are excluded from this rule.

WHITELIST Gaming Journalism Ethics Censorship Official Social Justice Media Meta Tabletop gaming, comics, sci-fi/fantasy, manga/anime, and derivative media of such Sub related OC Artwork Tech Happenings

TEMPORARY WHITELIST ITEMS None

BLACKLIST Unrelated Politics Memes (as in image macros) E-Celeb Bullshit Forum Noise (random users complaining on random forums [directly involved devs are exempt from this]) Social Media Hot Takes Lets Plays

NOTES To pass unrelated pol, topics containing politicians; laws; government or major political organizations without direct relation to GamerGate, must be presented without partisan slant and the majority of the topic must focus on relevant actions or proposals, rather than their partisan or electoral implications.

Official social justice is defined as: The propagation or implementation of identity politics by institutions or companies of major size.

Tech Happenings is defined as: Significant events concerning the policies, business practices, algorithms, behavior, and corporate cultures of tech companies and social networks, especially where pertaining to free expression, identity politics, and anti-consumer activities, as well as legislation affecting tech spaces.

If you believe your post is of sufficient importance to the subreddit but are concerned that it would not pass the above guidelines, please contact the modteam for approval

.

  1. POSTS MUST BE INTELLIGIBLE Non-English links must include a translation in the immediate comments from the OP. This can be either a full length translation, a copypaste of a machine translation, or a direct link to a full machine translation of the page.

All links to videos longer than 5 minutes will require either a comment by the OP or to be in a self post summarizing the relevant parts of the video to what they are trying to point out with it. Exceptions may be allowed if the title is clearly explaining what's going on with the link pointing directly at the relevant timestamp in the video.

Avoid mobile links if possible.

.

  1. WE ARE NOT YOUR PERSONAL ARMY Don't post a call to action against someone or something you disagree with.

Don't make posts like "let's give that idiot a piece of our mind!" if you come across something stupid someone said on the Internet. If you want to point and laugh, then post an archive, but engineering brigades or dogpiles against individuals or other communities will not be tolerated. The rule of thumb here is to look but don't touch. If you choose to take action offsite in direct response to something posted here, you will be dealt with as having violated this rule, if not sitewide rules.

Additionally, random, stupid things said by nobodies on Twitter, Facebook, etc. should not be posted. A "nobody" is defined as any account with fewer than 2,500 followers, or anyone who does not otherwise meet the "public figure" or "limited-purpose public figure" requirements.

You are not allowed to directly link to other communities.

.

  1. ARCHIVE AS MUCH AS YOU CAN Use link archivers for as many things as possible.

This is to preserve articles in their original format in case they are edited in the future, as well as to ensure that the articles comments sections are not brigaded. Record-keeping is important, and archiving pages are our way to preserve those records. Additionally, there is an active blacklist of sites that will automatically be pulled if not archived. You can find this list here.

Some links like GoFundMe and Bitchute get temp canned on reddit for a bit, whereas links to Encyclopedia Dramatica and Kiwifarms will never be approved because of reddit sitewide doxxing rules.

.

  1. DON'T POST MISLEADING CONTENT We want to make sure we're not reading garbage, or being lied to about some of the claims being made here.

To ensure this, posts should be free from the following:

7.1 EDITORIALIZED TITLES These are post titles for news articles that are framed in such a way as to push discussion in a single direction, typically stirring outrage, rather than leaving it up to the commentators in the thread. Hyperbole is a form of misinformation; you don't have to add anything "spicy" to the article's headline—it's better to simply post the headline itself. Additionally, quotation marks should be reserved for the exact wording someone used. If you need to add inline context, put the words that weren't said [in square brackets].

7.2 MISINFORMATION Defined as the intentional spread of provably incorrect information, or spinning a narrative without presenting all the facts. Typically, there is a degree of agenda-pushing or soapboxing related to this. Note that well-intended posts with information that has yet to be proven will simply be given an [Unverified] flair. However, any claims that are proven false after a post is made will result in it being given [Fake News] flair, and a stickied comment correcting the information, regardless of vote totals. This is to prevent the spread of misinformation on KiA.

7.3 SPAM AND SELF-PROMOTION Users posting anything that can be considered spam or self-promotion must demonstrate a 4:1 ratio of participation/commenting in unrelated posts to self-promotion. For example, for every 1 post or comment promoting their own material (websites, videos, social media, etc.), they must have at least 4 comments or posts that are participating in KiA (or other communities) that are wholly unrelated to discussion of their material.

.

  1. DO NOT REPOST We will remove reposts of the same information.

This includes posting articles on the same topic from different publications when one is already on the front page, unless there is substantial new information. If a post is older than 7 days, its content can be reposted for visibility, if the situation warrants it.

Moderators

  • HandofBane
  • Fjiordor
  • ITSigno
  • TheHat2
  • Notalent
  • Limon_Lime
  • nogodafterall
  • _noface
  • and 3 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - 2p765 (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy