Win / KotakuInAction
KotakuInAction
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction The almost-official GamerGate website
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

136
Alex Kaplan / Media Matters - "A pro-Trump forum is helping other toxic subreddits relaunch outside of Reddit" (KiA mentioned) (archive.md)
posted 4 years ago by B-VOLLEYBALL-READY 4 years ago by B-VOLLEYBALL-READY +138 / -2
69 comments share
69 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (69)
sorted by:
▲ 96 ▼
– coke501 96 points 4 years ago +96 / -0

If you don't like it, why don't you build your own?

Why the fuck do you build your own? Stop it.

It's exhausting.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 32 ▼
– deleted 32 points 4 years ago +33 / -1
▲ 9 ▼
– AsahiNoHikari 9 points 4 years ago +9 / -0

Unless it's a Japanese instance of Mastodon.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– KiTA 14 points 4 years ago +14 / -0

Yeah, they were absolutely gobsmacked that the whole "anyone can build their own" thing might result in Japan doing so but refusing to implement the same exact rules they did.

Or perhaps they were just surprised that Japan refused to be their new pet minority and accept cultural and social marching orders from their "betters." (White Liberal Women.)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– AsahiNoHikari 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

They perhaps weren't expecting the lolis. I'm not sure if I should be glad or disappointed they never seemed to stumble upon the guro.

Thank god for the language barrier I guess.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– KiTA 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0

They definitely couched it in outrage over the lolis, which falls flat given how much underage and statutory rape fanfic is on their tumblr shipping blogs, but it was more in the fact that Japan refuses to adjust their definition of a cute girl to include 500 pound uggos with skin disorders and vaugely brown skintones.

Basically, "muh male gaze."

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0
▲ 30 ▼
– Aurondarklord 30 points 4 years ago +30 / -0

They never actually mean for you to really DO it. It's just meant to be a thought-terminating cliche.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– deleted 16 points 4 years ago +16 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– mbnhedger 6 points 4 years ago +7 / -1

I dont even care if they are on the lawn. I want them to stop complaining about me trying to mind my own business.

You have a bunch of terrible people, who have surrounded themselves with more terrible people to the point where they simply think everyone is terrible like them and cant be left to their own devices or else they will go on a raping spree...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 51 ▼
– deleted 51 points 4 years ago +51 / -0
▲ 36 ▼
– coke501 36 points 4 years ago +36 / -0

It's funny. I mean reddit made it very clear that the users of the banned subs are not welcome at reddit. This should have been perfect for them. No spilling of users into other subs, all the deplorables leave for greener (or whatever) pastures. Finally reddit is free of hate.

It almost sees like they thought all these people would just stop existing online.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 28 ▼
– deleted 28 points 4 years ago +28 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– coke501 6 points 4 years ago +7 / -1

Reddit doesn't learn that you can't kill dissent by silencing it.

Do they though? I find it hard to believe that they really thought this move will help their goals. Do they (et al) overestimate their grip on the conversation, oder do we underestimate peoples threshold for bullshit?

[EDIT]underestimate instead of overestimate[/EDIT]

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– krzyzowiec 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

They tried to justify white hating subs by going with "unless you're in the majority". They're not sending their best.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– KiTA 17 points 4 years ago +17 / -0

To quote the Slate Star Codex article, "Neutral vs Conservative: The Eternal Struggle," now offline due to the NYT trying to dox the liberal author for refusing to be a progressive foot soldier:

https://archive.vn/trFCU

Look. I read Twitter. I know the sorts of complaints people have about this blog. I’m some kind of crypto-conservative, I’m a traitor to liberalism, I’m too quick to sell out under the guise of “compromise”. And I understand the sentiment. I write a lot about how we shouldn’t get our enemies fired lest they try to fire us, how we shouldn’t get our enemies’ campus speakers disinvited lest they try to disinvite ours, how we shouldn’t use deceit and hyperbole to push our policies lest our enemies try to push theirs the same way. And people very reasonably ask – hey, I notice my side kind of controls all of this stuff, the situation is actually asymmetrical, they have no way of retaliating, maybe we should just grind our enemies beneath our boots this one time.

And then when it turns out that the enemies can just leave and start their own institutions, with horrendous results for everybody, the cry goes up “Wait, that’s unfair! Nobody ever said you could do that! Come back so we can grind you beneath our boots some more!”

Conservatives aren’t stuck in here with us. We’re stuck in here with them. And so far it’s not going so well. I’m not sure if any of this can be reversed. But I think maybe we should consider to what degree we are in a hole, and if so, to what degree we want to stop digging.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– krzyzowiec 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Wow those quotes are gold. Thanks for the link!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– pseudosapient 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

SSC is/was golden.

It was one of the (very) few places where you could actually hold discourse, and could actually disagree with one another.

One interesting measure of a site is how far of an outlier your views can visibly be while still being welcomed and discussed, and SSC was the winner on that metric. By far.

I'm suffering from SSC withdrawal already.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– KiTA 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

They do have two subreddits, but I have no idea how welcoming they are. The_motte and SlateStarCodex.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– pseudosapient 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

I already know about those, but thank you.

welcoming

There's a strong distinction between "no-one can say another person's view is incorrect" and remaining calm while holding rational discourse in the face of disagreements. They are both "welcoming" in some sense; the latter is what I'm looking for.

SSC is/was the latter; the subreddits were both leaning toward the former from what I saw before I left.

I'd like somewhere where someone can go "yes, given these axioms that's valid logic from there" (or "no, that's invalid reasoning given this value-set and here's why") without going "I don't hold these axioms so these axioms are WRONG, end of story". If that makes sense.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– deleted 9 points 4 years ago +9 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– pseudosapient 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

More like they expect everyone to drink the kool-aid.

By which I mean, a lot of people seem to expect that if you always force everyone to signal X, people with dissenting opinions will sooner or later go "everyone else is signaling X so X must be correct".

It's way over-naive naive Bayesian analysis taken to an extreme. i.e. "I think X is 10% likely, this person thinks X is definitely true, so I'll adjust to 11%, this person thinks X is definitely true so I'll adjust to 12%, etc, etc, X is definitely likely".

In practice, what happens is instead "I think X is 10% likely, but am being pushed to say X. This person says X is definitely true, but I think there's an 80% chance that everyone is being pushed to say X not just me. Adjust to 11% likely. This other person says X is also definitely true, but I think there's an 80% chance that everyone is being pushed to say X not just me and I'm not going to double-count. I still think X is 11% likely, and now think there's an 81% chance that everyone is being pushed to say X. Repeat.".

(This is also overly naive, but gets the idea across hopefully.)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– darthskids 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

You must consoom product and order more product! No, not that product!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 32 ▼
– B-VOLLEYBALL-READY [S] 32 points 4 years ago +32 / -0

Links Polygon and Vox as proof we're evil.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– coke501 18 points 4 years ago +18 / -0

Well, if they say so, it must be true. They are journalists, after all /s

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– RumorControl 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

oooo i'm shaking

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 30 ▼
– _noface 30 points 4 years ago +30 / -0

Free advertisement is always good :)

permalink save report block reply
▲ 33 ▼
– deleted 33 points 4 years ago +33 / -0
▲ 19 ▼
– _noface 19 points 4 years ago +19 / -0

We used to exist in Reddit, and had multiple places linking to us claiming we were toxic. The way I see it, it only ever served to bolster our popularity.

More advertisement of our new home can only be a good thing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– coke501 16 points 4 years ago +16 / -0

There's bound to be a few hate-readers that will stop and start wondering where all the harrasement is hiding.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– deleted 10 points 4 years ago +10 / -0
▲ 14 ▼
– ErikaThePaladin 14 points 4 years ago +14 / -0

Let them come. We may be pro-free speech, but not pro-dickwolves. They can't behave and follow rules when there's wrongthink abound.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 20 ▼
– HandofBane 20 points 4 years ago +21 / -1

I think we are actually the one they have to be scared about seeing make the jump, more than others, as we worked within the reddit rules better than most subs actively, and our taking this step despite not even being quarantined shows a hard vote of No Confidence in the reddit admins.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– AnarcrotheAlchemist 16 points 4 years ago +16 / -0

They won't care.

They let the mask slip with that mod news post.

Reddit claims it anti hate speech and anti violence but it has been allowing rampant cop hate and cop threats for over a month now. Every default sub is flooded with stuff like ACAB and more violent language.

The site has been given over to the lunatic fringe left.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– evil-doer 11 points 4 years ago +11 / -0

Its absolutely insufferable. I had to unsub from /technology beacuse its just story after story about politics and its overrun with woke idiots. Any logic expressed is downvoted to hell.

And /news .. my god. Its a gathering of every story they can find to paint cops and white people as bad. With the headlines almost always being misleading or outright lies

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0
▲ 8 ▼
– deleted 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0
▲ 19 ▼
– Aurondarklord 19 points 4 years ago +19 / -0

The amount of salt here is hilarious.

"Nooooo how can ideas I don't like exist anywhere?!"

permalink save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– ESolveig 15 points 4 years ago +15 / -0

haha servers go brrrrr

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– deleted 17 points 4 years ago +17 / -0
▲ 11 ▼
– Yoshismasher22 11 points 4 years ago +11 / -0

As if we hadn’t heard that word a million, billion times before. :/

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 14 ▼
– zero6ix 14 points 4 years ago +14 / -0

This article smacks of anger, that we weren't lined up against the wall, and escaped to fight another day. Or just sad that they have no real control. Either way...delicious.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– FluffiPuff 13 points 4 years ago +13 / -0

SJWs: learn 2 code

GAMERS: Okay.

SJWs: REEEEE

permalink save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– Rogoho 12 points 4 years ago +12 / -0

Nnnnnooooo, you were suppose to wait your turn to be cancelled.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– deleted 12 points 4 years ago +12 / -0
▲ 10 ▼
– CatatonicMan 10 points 4 years ago +10 / -0

Free advertising? Neat.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Crash_Override 9 points 4 years ago +9 / -0

They just can’t stand it. They thought they had an iron grip on the Internet narrative and now they are seeing it slip between their fingers.

No doubt a coordinated effort is already underway to try and get ICANN to rescind the .win registrations with the likes of the shitheads at Google and CNN leading the charge.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– jormungandr 9 points 4 years ago +9 / -0

So what, we're just not allowed to exist? How's that supposed to work in a world where clearly not everyone can agree on shit yet you're basically trying to outlaw opposing viewpoints.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– pseudosapient 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

I mentioned this elsewhere in this thread.

The idea is to get into a self-perpetuating scheme where everyone hears everyone else saying X, so they think that they themselves must be mistaken. And then over time you get everyone thinking X too.

In practice this relies on way-overly-naive Bayesian analysis, and isn't what happens at all.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– runa71968 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

forum created to circumvent previous Reddit restrictions

in other words "a forum on the internet" haha

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Zaszz345 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

NOOOOO! YOU CANT JUST START YOUR OWN FORUM WHERE WE CANT CENSOR YOU!!!! THAT IS RACIST, SEXIST, HOMOPHOBIC AND BIGOTED. Fuck them. Their tears sustain me.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +2 / -1
▲ 6 ▼
– EjjiZaBuraddoejji 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

using a backup forum created to circumvent previous Reddit restrictions.

Talking as if Reddit owned the internet or something.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– ButMyFeelings 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

“Banned for commonly spreading misinformation?” All of the descriptions in that article of other “toxic” subreddits that have migrated to .win are misleading, subjective, or just false. Hello pot, I’m kettle...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– TheHat2 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

Gotta love how this fuckstick wanted us banned suddenly so we'd have no place to reorganize ourselves.

Implying that the word wouldn't have gotten out in some way if we didn't have any backup plans established... for the last five years.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– VRTrekkie 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

honestly wish the fucking worst for pond scum like this who would have us nuked off the internet without any recourse

Fuck you Alex

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– wylanderuk 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

How dare thoses we don't like have thier own places!!!!

How about its just us doing what we told you fucksticks to do...Make your own shit.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– TheImpossible1 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

I'm kind of surprised they're drawing attention to this idea. Surely the plan would be to ignore it for now in the hope that it dies from lack of interest.

Nearly a top 1000 website already though, so maybe they see the writing on the wall.

I just hope we don't ever have a GenderCritical.win.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– MAGAnic316 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

.win: it's over, we have the high ground.

Reddit: you underestimate my power!!!

.win: don't try it...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– justanotherindiedev 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Sounds like an angry chapocel

permalink save report block reply

OUR MISSION
KotakuInAction is a platform for open discussion of the issues where gaming, nerd culture, the Internet, and media collide.

We believe that the current standards of ethics in the media have alienated the artists, developers, and creators who perpetuate the things we love, enjoy, and enthusiastically build communities around. We have observed numerous incidents involving conflicts of interest and agenda-pushing within media which we feel are damaging to the credibility of the medium and harm the community at large. We believe much of the current media is complicit in the proliferation of an ideology that squashes individuality, divides along political lines, and is stifling to the freedom of creativity that is the foundation of human expression.

KotakuInAction is a community that condemns willful censorship, exclusion, harassment, and abuse. It is a community that organizes to hold the media accountable to the concept of artistic freedom by standing up for the artist, the developer, the writer, the filmmaker, and all who enjoy the freedom to create, explore, and expand. It is a community that allows the exchange of information, supports the ongoing discussion of media ethics, and protects the right of the individual to embrace their personal interests in entertainment and fandom.

KotakuInAction is built around a core focus on reasonable, friendly discussion of the issues related to gaming culture, and those involved in it. That is not all we are about, but it's where we began and will remain our core. We hold ourselves to be politically neutral ground, not forcing anyone to conform in their opinions, and permitting a wide variety of viewpoints to express themselves in a civil manner.
.

. GENERAL RULES

  1. DON'T BE A DICKWOLF Attack arguments, not people.

"Fuck off, retard," is not an argument. Neither is "Kill yourself, faggot." Regardless of whether you think someone is a shill, SJW, or whatever, stick to arguing the points. Name-calling does not contribute to discussion. Refer to the pyramid as a general guideline. If anything, just make sure your criticism outweighs any insults. However, well-reasoned arguments that end with parting shots like, "Stop being obtuse; even children understand this concept," are okay. Ostensibly, we're all adults here; a comment like that can just be ignored.

The core of this rule is primarily based on patterns of behavior, which fall into these categories:

1.1 HARASSMENT Badgering and/or baiting another user across multiple threads or baiting after disengaging (mod enforced or otherwise), including persistent /u/ mentions and/or replies. Note that this generally does not apply to people that are outside the subreddit, (e.g. "God, the guy who wrote that article is such a fucking retard."), but does apply in cases of /u/ tagging a user (e.g. "/u/reallybadpersonidontlike you're a fucking mongoloid and you should go die in a fire.").

1.2 TROLLING Posts and comments which are clearly not intended to generate discussion, but rather aimed at generating or maximizing as much drama and emotion as possible. Intentionally posting to make people angry.

1.3 CRUSADING Posts and comments intended to drive a wedge in the community, or to rally a mob to target users or communities, without the intent to hold a constructive discussion. Crusading eschews conversation, going beyond well-meaning criticism into behavior that includes excessive attacks against specific users, demands that action be taken against specific users, and/or bombarding a post with hostility towards KiA or specific users.

1.4 BRIGADING Coming into KiA from a previous sub to post virulent comments, or otherwise try to manipulate the sub. This includes (but is not limited to) uncivil comments from users who frequent (within the last ~2 months) a meta/drama sub that has linked to a specific KiA post, and users who comment on removed posts. This also applies to users who link to KiA on these meta/drama subs, either by archive, screenshot, or direct link. Any non-KiA brigadiers are subject to an expedited ban. We don't have a problem with you criticizing KiA on other subs, just don't come into those threads to start shit after they've been linked. Participate civilly, if you're going to participate at all.

1.5 MALICE Don't resort to malicious name-calling, brazen insults, and/or general hostility against any individual user. Don't use identity politics or unironic slurs (that is, language intended to advocate blatant hatred) against groups of people. Behavior that encourages, glorifies, incites, or calls for violence or physical harm against an individual or a group of people is not allowed, in conjunction with sitewide rules. Do your best to treat your fellow community members excellently.

1.6 ESCALATION TOWARD VIOLENCE Posts and comments making declarative statements about a potential civil war/boogaloo will be removed from KiA. By "declarative statements" any comments which delve into the area of "if X keeps doing Y, then there will be a violent response" or similar are to be included . These removals will not be issued warnings/bans as long as other rules are not breached, just a public statement of why they were removed.

Examples of things which will likely cause removal:

"If they show up at my place, they'll get a face full of lead"

"If they show up here and police try to shut them down, there will be bloodshed"

Other statements which can be interpreted as escalation toward an actual violent act. This list is not all inclusive, these are just examples. We will try to be lenient on it where we can, but have to step in now due to a repeated pattern of this showing up in our report queue.

More generic things like "This will end badly" will not be removed under this rule.

.

  1. DON'T POST PERSONAL INFORMATION Reddit is very strict about the publication of "personal information," commonly referred to as "doxing," so don't post it.

Personal information is constituted as:

2.1 DIRECTLY LINKING TO PERSONAL SOCIAL MEDIA Exceptions are made for "public figures," including (but not limited to) journalists, actors, published authors, and public-facing company personalities. However, direct links to Facebook and LinkedIn are not allowed, due to sitewide rules. Posting archive links to personal information is considered directly linking to it. Linking your own information is permitted. Posts from accounts with fewer than 2,500 followers, or anyone who does not otherwise meet the "public figure" or "limited-purpose public figure" requirements must be in the form of screenshots with all identifying information censored.

2.2 REAL NAMES Exceptions are made for the public figures as mentioned above, also including primary subjects of articles from multiple non-blog sites (or "limited-purpose public figures").

2.3 PHONE NUMBERS OR ADDRESSES Public contact numbers/address for companies (not including individual employees) are exempt.

2.4 OTHER INFO WHICH MAY BE USED TO PERSONALLY IDENTIFY SOMEONE Including sites hosting personal information, images of homes, etc.

If you are in doubt whether what you posted may constitute posting personal information, reach out to the moderator team.

.

  1. POSTING GUIDELINES Posts on KotakuInAction must focus on one of the topics included in the whitelist and may not include a topic from the blacklist. Post that do not meet this criterium will be removed. Removals due to Rule 3 alone have no consequences aside from the post being removed.

Meta Posts are excluded from this rule.

WHITELIST Gaming Journalism Ethics Censorship Official Social Justice Media Meta Tabletop gaming, comics, sci-fi/fantasy, manga/anime, and derivative media of such Sub related OC Artwork Tech Happenings

TEMPORARY WHITELIST ITEMS None

BLACKLIST Unrelated Politics Memes (as in image macros) E-Celeb Bullshit Forum Noise (random users complaining on random forums [directly involved devs are exempt from this]) Social Media Hot Takes Lets Plays

NOTES To pass unrelated pol, topics containing politicians; laws; government or major political organizations without direct relation to GamerGate, must be presented without partisan slant and the majority of the topic must focus on relevant actions or proposals, rather than their partisan or electoral implications.

Official social justice is defined as: The propagation or implementation of identity politics by institutions or companies of major size.

Tech Happenings is defined as: Significant events concerning the policies, business practices, algorithms, behavior, and corporate cultures of tech companies and social networks, especially where pertaining to free expression, identity politics, and anti-consumer activities, as well as legislation affecting tech spaces.

If you believe your post is of sufficient importance to the subreddit but are concerned that it would not pass the above guidelines, please contact the modteam for approval

.

  1. POSTS MUST BE INTELLIGIBLE Non-English links must include a translation in the immediate comments from the OP. This can be either a full length translation, a copypaste of a machine translation, or a direct link to a full machine translation of the page.

All links to videos longer than 5 minutes will require either a comment by the OP or to be in a self post summarizing the relevant parts of the video to what they are trying to point out with it. Exceptions may be allowed if the title is clearly explaining what's going on with the link pointing directly at the relevant timestamp in the video.

Avoid mobile links if possible.

.

  1. WE ARE NOT YOUR PERSONAL ARMY Don't post a call to action against someone or something you disagree with.

Don't make posts like "let's give that idiot a piece of our mind!" if you come across something stupid someone said on the Internet. If you want to point and laugh, then post an archive, but engineering brigades or dogpiles against individuals or other communities will not be tolerated. The rule of thumb here is to look but don't touch. If you choose to take action offsite in direct response to something posted here, you will be dealt with as having violated this rule, if not sitewide rules.

Additionally, random, stupid things said by nobodies on Twitter, Facebook, etc. should not be posted. A "nobody" is defined as any account with fewer than 2,500 followers, or anyone who does not otherwise meet the "public figure" or "limited-purpose public figure" requirements.

You are not allowed to directly link to other communities.

.

  1. ARCHIVE AS MUCH AS YOU CAN Use link archivers for as many things as possible.

This is to preserve articles in their original format in case they are edited in the future, as well as to ensure that the articles comments sections are not brigaded. Record-keeping is important, and archiving pages are our way to preserve those records. Additionally, there is an active blacklist of sites that will automatically be pulled if not archived. You can find this list here.

Some links like GoFundMe and Bitchute get temp canned on reddit for a bit, whereas links to Encyclopedia Dramatica and Kiwifarms will never be approved because of reddit sitewide doxxing rules.

.

  1. DON'T POST MISLEADING CONTENT We want to make sure we're not reading garbage, or being lied to about some of the claims being made here.

To ensure this, posts should be free from the following:

7.1 EDITORIALIZED TITLES These are post titles for news articles that are framed in such a way as to push discussion in a single direction, typically stirring outrage, rather than leaving it up to the commentators in the thread. Hyperbole is a form of misinformation; you don't have to add anything "spicy" to the article's headline—it's better to simply post the headline itself. Additionally, quotation marks should be reserved for the exact wording someone used. If you need to add inline context, put the words that weren't said [in square brackets].

7.2 MISINFORMATION Defined as the intentional spread of provably incorrect information, or spinning a narrative without presenting all the facts. Typically, there is a degree of agenda-pushing or soapboxing related to this. Note that well-intended posts with information that has yet to be proven will simply be given an [Unverified] flair. However, any claims that are proven false after a post is made will result in it being given [Fake News] flair, and a stickied comment correcting the information, regardless of vote totals. This is to prevent the spread of misinformation on KiA.

7.3 SPAM AND SELF-PROMOTION Users posting anything that can be considered spam or self-promotion must demonstrate a 4:1 ratio of participation/commenting in unrelated posts to self-promotion. For example, for every 1 post or comment promoting their own material (websites, videos, social media, etc.), they must have at least 4 comments or posts that are participating in KiA (or other communities) that are wholly unrelated to discussion of their material.

.

  1. DO NOT REPOST We will remove reposts of the same information.

This includes posting articles on the same topic from different publications when one is already on the front page, unless there is substantial new information. If a post is older than 7 days, its content can be reposted for visibility, if the situation warrants it.

Moderators

  • HandofBane
  • Fjiordor
  • ITSigno
  • TheHat2
  • Notalent
  • Limon_Lime
  • nogodafterall
  • _noface
  • and 3 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - rgqpq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy